Solutions · Training & Competency

The SOP went live.The training didn't.

The workflow that releases a procedure should create the training that goes with it. It doesn't, so completion lags the effective date on every change. Unifize ties the training to the revision, the person and the proof they can do the work.

Is everyone trained on the current version? Read it off one chart

Runs wherever training records are inspected

Every role qualified for the version it works to.

The training work quality and operations actually run, as governed workflows: created by the change, owned by a named trainee and supervisor, closed on proof of competence.

Training that follows the change

A revised procedure, a deviation or an audit finding creates the training it implies.

  • Training needs from document and process changes
  • Retraining after a deviation or audit finding
Runs in the DMS product →

Assignment and follow-through

Named trainees, their supervisors copied, and escalation before overdue training blocks the line.

  • Assignment, completion tracking and escalation
  • New-hire and role-change plans
  • Periodic refreshers

Competency and qualification

What each role must be able to do, who can do it, and the evidence behind it.

  • Competency assessment and qualification records
  • Role qualification matrix
  • Reassessment

The training happened. The record never heard.

The failure modes we see inside training and competency. None of them is a missing feature. All of them are training that happened off the record.

  1. Late training cascade after change closureThe procedure goes live. The training catches up weeks later.
  2. Training matrix is the first audit pull and the last system updatedNo daily work depends on it, so it is never current.
  3. Training completion ticks the box without competency evidenceThe record says trained. The floor says it depends.
  4. New hire ramp is a tribal-knowledge processWhen the trainer is out, the new hire stalls.

Every effective date reconciled against every training record, by hand. That reconciliation is the coordination tax.

Measure your coordination tax →

Train on the change, before the change goes live.

Most training systems record a completion. Unifize creates the training from the revision, owns it with the named person and their supervisor, and closes it on a qualified trainer's sign-off, so the matrix is current because the work made it current.

One product runs the training work.

Training Management ships inside the Document Management System, linked to the controlled documents whose revisions create the training.

Runs in

Document Management System

Training created by the revision, owned by the person, closed on proof of competence.

Explore the product →

It sits beside the systems you already run.

Keep the HR system that holds people and roles, and the learning system that holds courses. The training a revision creates runs on Unifize, tied to the controlled document, signed off with a 21 CFR Part 11 signature.

CONTEXTWRITE-BACKARTIFACTSDECISIONSYour systems of recordHRISLMSERPMESUnifizeSheets and sign-in formsSheetsEmailBindersMeetings

Proof, to the standard you'd hold us to.

A signed baseline, plus the teams who run their training on Unifize, in their own words.

When training becomes the finding.

Each of these starts a clock, and each routes into training management, so the answer comes from the record instead of a reconciliation.

Audit finding on training records

Routes to Training Management · owned by VP Quality · Training

Change-driven training cascade gap

Routes to Training Management · Change Control · owned by Training · Quality · Operations

Version mismatch at site discovered

Routes to Training Management · Document Control · owned by Training · Document Control · Manufacturing

Trained on the version in use.

Bring one real procedure change and its training cascade, and see it run on your own work in a 30-minute walkthrough.