Daily QC on the method
ISO/IEC 17025 · Westgard rules
- Nonconformance raisedAnalyst
- Affected results heldLab ops
- Root cause · BAL-07 calibrationMetrology
- Corrective actionTechnical signatory
- Effectiveness checkIn control
Built for ISO/IEC 17025-accredited testing and calibration labs, where every nonconformance, method deviation, and analyst competency record has to stay traceable, and survive the accreditation surveillance audit.
Built for ISO/IEC 17025-accredited labs
Your LIMS records the result. Unifize reconstructs the decision trace around it: the nonconformance, the root cause, the corrective action, and the effectiveness check the assessor asks for.
The reconstruction always lands on someone. Find your seat, and see what you own when the trace has to hold up at the accreditation surveillance audit.
Every nonconformance and corrective action stays reconstructable.
Method deviations and dispositions move on one accountable thread.
Method validation, measurement uncertainty, and calibration traceability stay current and linked.
Raw data, audit trails, and electronic signatures are held to ALCOA+.
Analyst competency and re-qualification stay current with every method change.
Each runs with ISO/IEC 17025 built in. Start with the one that costs you most.
From the nonconforming result to an effectiveness check inside the scope clock.
Validation evidence, uncertainty and issued results held with the scope they support, down to the reports a drift reached.
Out-of-tolerance found, affected results traced and held on one record.
Every method change reaches the analysts it touches, before the effective date.
Unifize sits alongside the LIMS, ELN, QMS, and calibration systems you already run. The corrective-action workflow lands value without a LIMS integration, and replaces the ungoverned channels where the decision trace goes missing.
Raw data, audit trails, and electronic signatures are attributable and time-stamped, so the technical record holds to ALCOA+ and, for FDA-regulated work, 21 CFR Part 11, not a reconstruction after the fact.
Nonconformance and corrective-action closure, analyst competency, calibration history, and method-validation traceability are walked through with your team, and built to survive the biennial surveillance audit.
Accreditation and statutory deadlines, not internal outcomes. Each one routes to the process that answers it and the team that owns the response.
Routes to Corrective Action & Effectiveness · owned by Quality
Routes to Corrective Action & Effectiveness · owned by Quality
Routes to Method Validation · owned by Technical & Method
$0.6Mto$6M
Pick a nonconformance or corrective action you could not replay at the last surveillance audit. We will reconstruct it live.